«

»

Feb 19

Kelvim Escobar Ready For Opening Day? “Oh yeah”

According to different Twitter reports the Mets are just proceeding with caution and are not overly concerned about Escobar’s status.

KBurkhardtSNY:Escobar says shoulder has no pain, but had some weakness. Pitched pain free in Venezuela this winter.

lenno212: Asked if he’d be ready for Opening Day, Kelvim Escobar said, “Oh yeah, I think so. It depends on how my arm responds to exercise.”

KBurkhardtSNY: Strenghtening program. He won’t pick up a ball yet, but feels confident he’ll be ready for opening day.

Related posts:

76 comments

  1. stickguy

    Wait, you mean the panic and omar bashing from the other day might have been premature and overblown?

    Darn. I am losing my faith in the digital media age, and Met blogs in particular.

    1. ceetar

      He’s not 100% positive that he’ll have enough time to strengthen his arm, but if that means it takes an extra week or two, taht’s not the end of the world either.

      1. trs86

        Agreed. I still love the “can’t pickup a ball” line. Nope he can’t pickup a ball because they told him not to worry about pitching until they do the strengthening exercises. LOL>

  2. metsfan4decades

    Gotta love the media all trying to trump each other with the latest ‘scoop’…

    Jerry on SNY live in 10 minutes – 11:30 conference delayed a few minutes.

    1. ceetar

      I think I might honestly care about Tiger more. Manuel never tells the truth and doesn’t have anything intelligent to add.

      1. GravediggerHebner

        Tiger’s done, Jerry’s up next!

  3. Mr North Jersey

    Jerry’s on SNY

  4. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: We’ll continue to add to the hitting program, try to individualize that more. Baserunning, with our speed we need to be really good at it, it’s a key fundamental going forward. Defensively, we have to be good. Pitching, we have to throw strikes.

    1. stickguy

      I could find T ball players that could come up with the same stuff without any help.

  5. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: We’ll emphasize driving the ball the opposite way not just hitting it the opposite way. You guys make it seem like that’s all we did every day last year that’s not the case.

    1. stickguy

      Ah, so Jerry is reading the press, and getting touchy about it.

      Wonder how that is going to play out?

      Like I said yesterday, he could go totally into a safe, by the book shell, or instead get all Gangsta, and say screw you all, and go out with a bang.

  6. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: If Pagan is the CF it gives us an opportunity to bat Reyes 3rd, he has the ability to bat anywhere 1st to 5th except 4th.

  7. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: Castillo or Pagan would be the lead off guy in the Reyes 3rd scenario.

    1. stickguy

      And I guess he reads our posts.

      Wonder if he is serious about the Reyes 3rd idea this year?

      1. prismo

        Probably not.

      2. ceetar

        given his track record, I’d say no. I’ve taken to believing if he talks about it, he’s probably not seriously considering it.

        1. prismo

          haha, my thinking exactly

      3. trs86

        I obviously think he should be. It lessens the pressure on Reyes for speed and allows him to just hit and get into the swing of things. Perhaps by the time Beltran is back you move him back to lead-off. Think about having Bay behind you instead of Castillo.

  8. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: We have to approach the 3rd spot in the order with consistency so Beltran’s coming back impacts our lineup decisions prior to his return.

  9. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: If Reyes bats 3rd I don’t worry about him trying to hit 30 HR. He’ll hit 2B and 3B and still be a threat on the bases wherever he hits. We ultimately didn’t do it last year because at that point we didnt’ have options to take over the lead off spot, Pagan and Castillo showed us in ’09 they could be viable options there.

  10. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: What happens when Beltran comes back depends on how Beltran feels when he comes back and how Reyes is performing at the time. There are many possible ways to stretch the lineup out if Reyes can succeed 3rd.

  11. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: I like that Jose is a switch hitter and becoming a 3rd hitter could be a part of his evolution as a ballplayer. He compares Lofton/Vizquel/Alomar to what the healthy full lineup of the Mets could be with Reyes 3rd, but notes the team would have to do a better job of baserunning.

  12. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: Reyes 3rd can only happen if he is totally comfortable with it, if he’s not we scrap it.

    1. ceetar

      preparing the excuses.

      1. GravediggerHebner

        being realistic, not monarchistic.

      2. metsfan4decades

        But Jerry qualifies it saying Jose is so excited to be back and playing if you told him I’m staring you off 8th to get you going, he would be fine with that.

        I get the impression Jerry was not worried about Jose being opened to trying 3rd, but if he wasn’t comfortable there or falters, they’d move him back.

  13. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: I’m more concerned with putting together the most productive offense than I am with what particular player is getting the most at bats over the course of a season. If that means Pagan 1st, Murphy 2nd, Reyes 3rd then so be it.

  14. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: Whatever fits best for the team is what we will do. I would LOVE to see him as the 3rd hitter, assuming the rest of it all comes together.

  15. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: I have to remember to say “if we remain healthy” about everything.

    1. prismo

      Thanks for the updates Grave. Great job!

  16. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: I think the main thing we needed to address this off season was our injuries. The opportunities the complementary players got last year enhances our depth going forward. If Pelfrey, Maine & Perez do what they’re capable of doing we’ll be good. We have to stop talking about potential and projection and start getting performance from our young players.

  17. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: We do need a quick start but we can’t put everything into that jeopardizing the season if that doesn’t happen. If we’re healthy the long run is most important. I can’t worry about the quick start I can only worry about preparing the team to play well for the long run.

  18. metsfan4decades

    Listening to Jerry…..

    How long do you think it will be before all collectively stop saying ‘if healthy’?

    1. stickguy

      2011?

      1. metsfan4decades

        LOL – I was afraid that would be the answer…..

    2. ceetar

      Last time is Wright in late October: “If we’re all healthy, I think we’ll all be in attendence for the Parade, yes.”

  19. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: I know that my situation is going to be tough be we can’t focus just on a good start. I have to focus on the long haul and avoid the temptation to not get players the proper rest. My greatest focus is keeping people healthy so they can take the field.

  20. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: 1B right now Murphy is “the guy.” Anything could happen and I have to make sure everyone gets the opportunity to play. If Murphy has played 5-6 days and a lefty is coming up I might get Tatis in there.

  21. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: If Niese pitches as well as he did before the injury it would be tough not to go forward with him in the rotation.

  22. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: Regarding Jacobs and in general I have to be careful in ST and not base so much just on ST, I have to have an idea of what I want to do based on more than ST. Somebody is going to have to do some serious damage to make me change the direction I think we need to go in at this point.

    1. metsfan4decades

      Curious that he admits there ‘I have a tendency to say, that’s my guy right off the bat’……

  23. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: For filling the bench power is important. In the NL having a guy that can come off the bench and pop one for you is important. Playing people out of position just happens sometimes.

    1. ceetar

      so is that support for Jacobs? Does he realize Tatis and Cora doesn’t have much power? Gary Matthews? who’s he supporting here?

      1. GravediggerHebner

        Seems to me it’s a rather thinly veiled reference to Jacobs, especially since it came after a question about Jacobs and Murphy and 1B. I wasn’t typing the questions so I’m not sure if that’s obvious to anyone just reading this but listening and trying to type as much as I could while doing so that seemed obvious to me.

        1. Mr North Jersey

          What? what’s that I hear? Can it be? Why it sounds like that dark horse Chris Carter just got out of the gate to proclaim that he too is in this race.

          :-)

          Let the race begin.

  24. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: I haven’t read or heard any particular statements made by the players. To me the statement is that there are 70 guys here early for spring training.

  25. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: The 8th inning role for the club coming together is perhaps the greatest question we have right now. ST is going to have to illuminate that role for me more than any other. If we resolve it here correctly that helps us down the line. If we resolve it here incorrectly we have to fix it later that’s a problem. Whoever it is has to consistently pound the strike zone.

  26. GravediggerHebner

    Jerry: From the catcher position, with Beltran out we’re going to need offense from that position. Overall we need defense from that position. We need to find the balance between those two things. Santos did hit a wall last year. Maybe he’s learned from that and grown. Maybe we learned that he’s not the guy for that job.

    1. stickguy

      And, we have a winner in the “first man thrown under the bus” contest. Congratulations Omir Santos!

      1. GravediggerHebner

        Well he did say “maybe.”

  27. metsfan4decades

    Strange question from M. Noble: ‘Who is your back up SS?’ Jerry quickly said Cora.

    Was there some controversy on who that would be? Maybe I missed something.

  28. GravediggerHebner

    When they threw it back to the studio Jonas Schwartz said the two headlines to come out of it will be:

    Jose Reyes may bat 3rd

    Jon Niese is a legit contender for the 5th spot

    1. trs86

      Well that and this one to me: Santos did hit a wall last year. Maybe he’s learned from that and grown. Maybe we learned that he’s not the guy for that job.

      We better hope Barajas signs then.

    2. stickguy

      Those were actually headlines (or at least concepts) from last year ST too.

      Neise was a dark horse candidate for the #5 spot, and Reyes moving down was bandied about (and maybe even tired a couple times?)

  29. trs86

    Interesting comments.
    I am thinking now that Nieve takes the last bullpen slot and Niese in the rotation? Perhaps Nieve goes to the pen while Escobar waits another month and then they reassess then?

    1. stickguy

      really depends on how ST goes. If Neise looks strong and fully ready to go, he could win the spot. And Neive to the pen does help out too, so it makes some sense.

      I still think Neise takes it slow and someone else starts in the 5 hole. ALthough who knows when that guy pitches for the first time, so Neive could win the job, and also spend a couple weeks in the pen?

      1. metsfan4decades

        Was thinking the same thing. Does anyone know right now if Niese is 100% healthy and ready to go from that hamstring surgery? Or are they waiting to see/make that evaluation here in ST?

        1. stickguy

          well, he has pitched 5 or so BP sessions already, and said he feels good, so I will give that a tentative, “hope so”

        2. trs86

          I heard he was on schedule and would be ready for ST?

  30. Mr North Jersey

    The best thing Jerry said was they need to keep players on the field and he needs to stay out of their way.

    Too bad I don’t expect to see him stay out of their way.

  31. trs86

    I think Jerry is serious this time about Reyes batting 3rd. It gives us more rbi guys in rbi positions and less stress on Reyes legs to start the season. I am very open to the change. It may develop Reyes as a true hitter.

    1. trs86

      Uh oh, David Lennon agrees with me. Perhaps I should change my mind?

      lenno212 Manuel’s right on Reyes – No. 3 slot best fit for lineup, especially without Beltran. Got to happen.

      1. GravediggerHebner

        Don’t worry, someone over at Mets Merized strongly disagrees with you and Lennon.

        http://metsmerizedonline.com/2010/02/reyes-batting-third-and-other-astonishing-tales.html

      2. njstuckintx

        We thinking he bats 3rd until Beltran comes back and then slots back to 1st, maybe 2nd position? No way he would stay in 3rd position. And maybe this keeps the Castillo, Reyes, 1-2 punch as an option down the line.

        1. GravediggerHebner

          Assuming for the sake of discussion that we can believe anything he says, the way I took what Jerry was saying of course had a lot of “ifs” and “maybes” but if Jose agrees to bat 3rd in the first place and if he is doing well in the spot at the time Beltran comes back he would stay there.

          1. njstuckintx

            Obviously basing on his word meaning something, I don’t think you would lose too much with Wright batting infront of Reyes, speed wise. Castillo, Wright, Reyes, Beltran, Bay, Murphy, Francouer, Catcher of the day, Pitcher. It could work.

          2. GravediggerHebner

            Pretty much regardless of how it shakes out 2-8, I like the idea of Castillo’s OBP in the 1 slot for a couple reasons.

            Obviously the OBP is the main reason. His lack of XBH power I think fits better 1st than 2nd or 8th, and I like him on base in front of people actually capable of XBH behind him.

            Perhaps the “best” reason to me is it keeps Jerry from calling for a sac bunt with one on and none out in the first inning. No way he sac bunts with Wright or Beltran, even he’s not that stupid/stubborn.

          3. njstuckintx

            Amen to that.

            Well, if you think of it, if you bury castillo in the 8 spot, you really can’t have him bunting with the Pitcher coming up next and since he gets on a good deal and has a little speed, he would be a good candidate to be sac’ed over by the pitcher.

            But I do like him sitting in the 1st spot.

    2. stickguy

      I agree. Last year it was more of a looking to the future idea. This year, there is actually needs to fill, and Reyes coming off the injury.

      Last year it disrupted a bunch of other guys too.

      Now, with Reyes off surgery, Luis off a full year with a decent OBP (and nothing else) and Beltran out, it does make a ton of sense. Although I still see him as the perfect #2 hitter also.

      Castillo/pagan/reyes/bay/wright/murphy/frenchy/catcher/pitcher ??

      and when Beltran comes back, go castillo/reyes/beltran?

      Not sure I like DW being buried in the 5th hole, so you could flip him and Bay.

      Lots of options, but even without Beltran, a very good lineup. Strong 1-5, and a much better bottom 6-8 than last year. And when Beltran comes back, it is very, very strong.

      1. GravediggerHebner

        I was typing and don’t have a DVR but I thought I heard one permutation of the lineup with Wright 2nd, I certainly could’ve misheard. I wasn’t sure so I didn’t type it in the “recap.”

        1. stickguy

          I saw that someplace. Maybe over at FWICG.com

          interesting idea. Don’t expect it though.

          I think if you go castillo/pagan/reyes, the obvious thing is to (assuming it is working) slide castillo and Reyes up one, and plug Beltran in behind them.

          1. GravediggerHebner

            When Beltran comes back I have no strong feelings either way (except my strong interest right now in at least seeing how Reyes 3rd might actually work in real life) but I think that Beltran could easily slide into the 2nd spot too, he’s done it before.

        2. metsfan4decades

          I don’t have a DVR either and was listening. I believe you’re right. He said it kind of quick when he was going through potential lineups, depending on the pitcher.

  32. Mr North Jersey

    The Reyes to 3rd idea especially with Beltran out of the lineup is a reasonable idea.

    One can envision Reyes excelling there but before the Mets start talking about moving Reyes out of a spot where he has had great success can they 1st see if he can hit the ball 1st like he did in the past?

    1. gategem

      The only potential problem I see with Reyes batting third is if he changes his approach to hitting in an effort to provide more hr power. With Reyes you never know.

  33. Mr North Jersey

    Lineups… lineups… lineups… what’s the best lineup? :-)

    One of the things I was trying to figure is with Wright, Bay and Frenchy all being right handed batters does Jerry and should Jerry try make sure they don’t end up lumped one behind the other?

    I see Bay as a straight up #4 hitter for us. If Wright is the #3 hitter that puts 2 righties together and I don’t see Frenchy batting behind Bay at #5 making it 3 righties all in a row.

    If Wright is #3 then I would guess
    Reyes a switch hitter is #1
    Castillo a lefty at #2
    Wright a righty #3
    Bay a righty #4
    Pagan a switch hitter #5 (to break up the righties)
    Frenchy a righty at #6
    Murphy a lefty #7
    Catcher a righty #8 (unless Thole makes team he is the only lefty)

    ***************************************************
    Now if you wanted to make Reyes a #3 hitter then here is another possibility.

    S. Pagan #1
    R. Wright #2
    S. Reyes #3
    R. Bay #4
    L. Murphy #5 (or my dark horse the lefty hitting Carter)
    R. Francouer #6
    L. Castillo #7
    R. Catcher #8 (again unless Thole the only lefty makes the team)

    Just throwing my 1 cent out there :-)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *