«

»

Apr 19

Ceetar’s Optimist’s Dossier

The Mets have dropped two more series since last week.  Is it still possible to be optimistic? Just in case you think I’m crazy, here’s a positive post from Mike Silva that reinforces some of what I’ve been saying.

Of course it is.  For starters, Jacobs can no longer bat 4th or 5th, since he’s been designated for assignment.  This already makes the lineup better, even if Manuel countered with batting Cattalanotto cleanup last night. The big news is that the Mets are talking about bringing up Ike Davis this week today.  While it’s hard to believe this doesn’t make the offense better, what’s really going to make the offense better is when Jose Reyes and Jason Bay and Pagan and Castillo break out of their mini-slumps and start hitting around their career numbers again. 

The offense has been the main culprit.  Maine hasn’t been good in the rotation, but if the lineup was clicking, or Manuel and HoJo thought about preaching patience a little bit against Wainwright, they could’ve won that game, or some of the other games where the pitching was only okay.  Let’s see how Maine does with hopefully a little more arm strength off throwing 115 pitches last night.  Jose Reyes looks like he’s about ready to get going, and Jason Bay is said to be streaky anyway.  Angel Pagan has started to pick it up off his slower start when he was platooning, and if Jerry gets him in their almost everyday and stops burying him down in the lineup, maybe he can drive in a couple more runs on this homestand. 

However, the biggest problem seems to be (besides the manager) that the team isn’t clicking as a unit.  This is just bad luck, and it’s why even championship teams occasionally go 4-8 during a long season.  The pressure put on this team was rediculous; For all that underdog talk with the silly prediction around the league, everyone still seems to have expected the Mets to have to get off to a fast start.  Well they didn’t.  This doesn’t make the season over.  A winning home stand puts them right back into the fight.  Break it down however you want to, but if players play to their capabilities there is no reason why the Mets can’t have a winning record over the next 10 games.  They just need to go out and do it, and allow Omar to fix the 1B situation and evaluate what else needs to be done.

Related posts:

69 comments

  1. udontmesswthejohan

    “This is just bad luck, and it’s why even championship teams occasionally go 4-8 during a long season.”

    Yes, it’s really bad luck when you score 2 runs in 20 innings and you get those two runs off of positions players throwing 75 MPH and both runs come on sac flies.

  2. Kingman 26

    Luck has less than nothing to do with losing 2 of 3 in all 4 series, at home and on the road, with good pitching and bad pitching.

    This team has a manager who has somehow gotten much worse than he was even last year.

    This team has an offensive disease which I have no idea how to mollify, let alone cure.

    Bringing up Davis is an outstanding first step.

    Firing the outrageously incompetent manager hopefully will happen soon.

  3. metsfan4decades

    With the talent on this team, I’m convinced this team isn’t as bad as the record indicates. It makes no sense to me right now. Most of the offense is not producing. I don’t know if it’s just incredibly bad luck with slow starts, the team not clicking as a whole, or the constant tinkering with this line up by the manager.

    Part of the problem is the black holes. Good start by saying bye bye to Jacobs. Next should be GMJ and Cat. We’ll be getting a real first baseman at 1st as soon as tonight or tomorrow apparently.

    I have no idea what it’s going to take to start winning some ball games but I wish they do it soon….

    1. gipperpdx

      My problem with the optimistic posts like this is all the “coulda, woulda, shoulda,” stuff. All of those are TRUE, but that is the case for every bad team – they are close, but don’t get it done because of x, y, z. A team is as good or as bad as its record, and the Mets ARE this bad. No reason for optimism yet, though I remain positive that 2011 will be better!

      1. GravediggerHebner

        Wasn’t it the fabulous Dennis Green who said something along the lines of “they are what we thought they were!”

        1. stickguy

          Bill Parcells said “you are what your record says you are”. That what you are thinking of?

        2. trs86

          Yup against the Bears I think.

      2. ceetar

        just give the title to the Rays then? don’t play it out, they’re going to set the major league record for wins.

  4. stickguy

    playing more bad teams is going to help. LOok what it did for the phillies to start the seson!

    ANd yes, I know the Mets had a little less success against the Nats (who are actually at .500 so far).

    but based on what they did to Philly, maybe the Fish are for real (at least to start). ANd the rockies and Cards are both almost concensus picks to make the post season.

    O, they picked a bad time for a collective team slump. And while I don’t think they will suddenly morph into the 1975 Reds overnight, no way the talent level on the team can fall off this bad and stay there. I hope.

    I would actually be more worried if they were hitting the crap out of the ball, and the pitching was horrendous. That they might not have a solution for!

    It really is amazing what a few guys getting hot an do for a team. A nice little 3 game winning streak can be enough to turn a season around.

    Feel pretty good about having Neise and Pelf in the next 2 games, and cautiously optomistic Ollie will continue to improve. So the pitching isn’t worrying me this series.

    So, sweep the cubs, get Davis settled in, and see what happens.

    Or get swept and fire Jerry, which is certainy a possibility.

  5. GravediggerHebner

    I think now is a fantastic moment in the Mets season to be optimistic about the offense. It has to improve according to almost every natural law, because with the exception of RF which is playing above expectation, every position in the lineup is performing below expectation (perhaps 3B is “at” expectation despite the low BA), especially 1B which will now be improved even if Davis somehow sucks because it was intolerably bad before.

    Through 12 games

    C – .184/.189/.327

    1B – .167/.245/.271

    2B – .229/.328/.250

    3B – .244/.466/.512

    SS – .154/.250/.231

    LF – .250/.345/.313

    CF – .245/.339/.286

    RF – .356/.436/.667

    1. trs86

      Agreed.

    2. stickguy

      except for 3B and RF, those numbers are just flat out depressing.

      but hell yeah, the ’62 Mets couldn’t do that bad over an entire season.

      If the pitching holds up, they certainly can go on a hot streak (say like last May) if a few of these guys get hot together.

      Imagine how much better the offense looks if just Reyes and Bay get hot, and Davis is any kind of improvement.

    3. darknova306

      Wow. That’s extremely telling.

    4. metsfan4decades

      +1

    5. ceetar

      Exactly why this doom and gloom is unwarranted. They came really close to winning a bunch of those games, where they just needed one or two more hits. even their RISP is well below what’s average.

  6. trs86

    Damn you John Lackey. I now officially hope your arm falls off and I have to cut you from my fantasy team. Ask Dirty how long it takes to make up for a crappy start. Lackey 3.1 innings 8 friggin earned runs. Seriously?

    1. stickguy

      sounds like the Met’s #2. Numbers would fit right in.

      But, you are doing better than me. I have John Maine on my team.

    2. dirtysanchez

      oh great NOW your pitching blows it lol….you dont recover…just hope the other guy has a similar start…thanks jake peavy

    3. GravediggerHebner

      At least you didn’t overpay him.

      1. trs86

        True, I picked him late too.

    4. trs86

      At least I had his counter-part Neimann, but to show you what one bad start can do…
      Neimann good start. 7 innings 2 runs. Lackey 8 runs in 3.1 innings. Team ERA 8.71.

  7. stickguy

    also, FWIW, the dynasty known as the Red Sox are also 4-8 so far. And unless they make a huge comeback from the beat down they are currently recieving, they are dropping to 4-9.

    Wonder if they (or more accurately, their fans) have written off the season as hopeless too?

    1. gategem

      Yes, the Mets and RedSox have identical talent. :)

      Actually considering the talent level of both the Rays and Yankees, barring injury, it’s possible the RedSox may not catch either team.

      1. GravediggerHebner

        While I personally believe that much of the Rays talent is more theoretical than actual I am nonetheless inclined to agree, if for no other reason than that the Red Sox just don’t have a lot of theoretical talent. Without a productive David Ortiz, Manny Ramirez/Jason Bay, there’s just not a lot of production in that lineup. Their’s and the Mariners’ seasons may be telling about where to draw a line of compromise on run production versus run prevention.

  8. gategem

    Of course the Mets are not this bad. Right now they are on target to win 54 games and we all know there’s no chance of that coming to pass. I projected the Mets to be a .500 team and I am optimistic that they will accomplish this feat.

  9. GravediggerHebner

    Ha ha ha. Caller just says to Mike “I think the Mets need Jesus in their lives” and Mike responds “Why would Jesus choose the Mets over any other team? That’s my problem with that.”

    1. trs86

      Should have protected him in the draft.

    2. ceetar

      Is that a veiled anti-semetic comment about Davis?

    3. gategem

      Didn’t some commentator say the same thing about Tiger Woods. :)

  10. trs86

    Something we need to remember is sample size. Obviously we hear about it all the time in regards to individual player stats but it applies to team stats and wins as well.

    Obviously there are a lot of things wrong right now, however many of those things by law of averages will just fix themselves? These next comments will lead to comments like “if my grandma had balls” but think about how many games this group was in the position to win. Take last night for example, could have easily won the game even with the pitching matchup. I am sure you can think of others. No they normally would not win all of those games yet is it that unreasonable to think that they could have won 3 of them? Just 3 wins and suddenly the Mets are 7-5 and are 1 game back tied with Atlanta and .5 games out of the wild card.

    Winning last night would have put us 2 games under .500 instead of 4, big difference. So while I am cautiously optimistic and realize it will take a lot of good consistent play, the season is far from over and we are not a 54 win team.

    1. GravediggerHebner

      I’ll respectfully leave your grandma out of this. I think you’re comment about natural law is most appropriate.

      Please forgive the fantasy baseball analogy, but years ago when I first started playing that I asked a trusted friend for advice on roster moves and his response was a cliche that stuck with me and mostly proves true with baseball players: “water seeks it’s own level.”

    2. gategem

      Generally speaking even bad teams play a number of games that they could have won but didn’t. What you’re reciting is the bad teams lament. And let’s not forget to add that they battled.

      1. ceetar

        they did battle. IT’S A BIG DEAL.

        Keep putting the guys on base, and the natural talent (And don’t be fooled, we’ve got a lot of it) of the hitters WILL drive in more runs with RISP. So yes, keep battling, keep putting those guys on base, and they’ll start to come in.

        1. trs86

          Yup, Mets in 2008 were 3rd in the league in runs scored yet managed a .253 BA with RISP and a .216 BA with the bases loaded. How is that possible? Because they along with the 1st and 2nd place team were the only ones in the NL with an OPS+ over 100.

          1. ceetar

            I thought the Mets were tied for most runs scored in 2008?

          2. trs86

            Tied Phillies trailed Cubs so in reality they finished 2nd.

      2. trs86

        Gategem, bad teams do not have the talent we do. Bad teams do not have a history of being competitive until an epic injury filled season. I guess it’s a difference of opinion if you honestly think this is a bad team. I for one don’t think we are that far off from each other. You say you expect .500. I expect about 88-92 wins. Being off by 6-8 wins for an entire season does not mean we have completely different views of the team.

        1. gategem

          I didn’t day the Mets were a bad team. I believe, as presently constructed, they’re a mediocre (.500) team . But using the argument about losing close games to prove that they are a good team or are very close to being one is fallacious because over the years I’ve seen many a bad team use the same argument. It’s the nature of the beast. Bad teams do not get blown out game after game. Most games seem to turn on one or two plays. The bad teams lose a preponderous of these games, while the mediocre teams win and lose approximately an equal share and the good teams find ways to win the majority of these games.

          I don’t take a half full or half empty approach. Basically if it’s an 8oz glass then I will tell you that there is 4oz of liquid in the glass. I look at baseball the same way.

          1. trs86

            Not disagreeing with that premise just saying that the Mets are not a bad team so that does not apply.

  11. Mr North Jersey

    Francesa says his Mets lineup would be

    1.Reyes/Pagan
    2.Pagan/Reyes
    3.Wright
    4.Bay
    5.Davis
    6.Frenchy
    7.Barajas
    8.Castillo/Cora
    9. Pitcher

    1. trs86

      Hmmm, tend to agree. I had Ike 7th, however with a hot Frenchy behind Ike perhaps he gets better pitches than in front of Barajas. Could make a case for sliding Bay down I guess.

      1. Mr North Jersey

        OK that’s it who are you and what did you do with TRS?

        :-)

      2. GravediggerHebner

        In this “what have you done for me lately” world does Frenchy still qualify as “hot?” He’s 1 for his last 10.

        1. trs86

          LOL, true I guess.

        2. DNDJohan aka kistics

          Hey that’s the best hitter in the lineup you are talking about.

        3. ceetar

          yeah, but that’s only two games.

    2. ceetar

      Francesa’s a raving lunatic.

      Reyes, Castillo, Wright, Bay, Davis, Frenchy, Barajas, Pagan, Niese.

      Actually, It’s hard not to be super pysched about that lineup. (rather Pagan/Barajas, but we all know about the mini-leadoff spot)

      1. trs86

        I see nothing lunatic like about that lineup. IF Jerry insist on batting Pagan 8th then Castillo is a better fit for that role.

        1. ceetar

          my comment wasn’t directed at his lineup, just him.

          but I hate Castillo 8th. seems aw aste. It’s Barajas’ spot.

          1. trs86

            Just saying IF Jerry is going to bat Pagan 8th I would just as soon have Castillo there.

    3. njstuckintx

      Frenchy just can’t catch a break from anyone, eh?

    4. stickguy

      Damned, I think I agree with him too.

      Banish Luis to the 8 hole, if not the corn field.

      1. Mr North Jersey

        WTF this is like Invasion Of The Body Snatchers everyone is agreeing with Mike.

        So I have to ask, who are you and what did you do with StickGuy?

        1. stickguy

          Hey, even a blind squirrel finds his nuts occasionally.

          Can I help it if MF finally had a rational thought?

          Now we just need Jerry to try it I guess.

  12. tkfj

    Who wants to bet that Davis gets called up and doesnt start tonight ahead of the Black Hole Gang?

    1. GravediggerHebner

      That would be as ridiculous as batting Cat 4th.

      As I typed that Mike F said “maybe Jerry batting Cat 4th was his way of telling Omar he needed Ike Davis.”

      1. Mr North Jersey

        Manuel says, you want to give me sh*t! I’ll show you sh*t!

        1. GravediggerHebner

          Yup. Omar gave Jerry some sh*t and Jerry put that sh*t in a paper bag and set it on fire on Omar’s doorstep.

          1. Mr North Jersey

            LoL Nice…

    2. trs86

      Most teams would not start him. Would allow him to take in his first game and relax. I hope he starts but lets not pretend that would be some god awful move.

      1. tkfj

        Yes, he can learn how not to play first base from Tatis/Catalanatto.

        1. trs86

          Who said that? Just saying the guy is most likely a big ball of nerves and some teams would give him a day to get situated maybe even a pinch hit or late game replacement.

          1. ceetar

            eh, throw him in there. I hate that attitude. He was around these guys like two weeks ago anyway. No better way to get over nerves then dive right in, catch a liner off the bat of Soriano in the first, and settle in.

          2. trs86

            I would too but just saying there is logic behind not doing it too. Just like most things, falls right in the gray area.

          3. ceetar

            stupid gray areas are what causes Manuel to keep his stupid job. boooooooo

  13. Mr North Jersey

    someone youtube’d video of Mike debating Jesus caller already LoL.

    1. Mr North Jersey

      that deserves a post brb.

    2. GravediggerHebner

      Dare I say “Jesus that was fast?”

      Way to get me for not quoting him perfectly Mr. NJ :-)

    3. DNDJohan aka kistics

      LOL!@!!@

      I know he’s trying to be respectful to the callers, but just hang up already.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *