«

»

May 28

Those Skunkie Phillies

Skunked: 1. To defeat overwhelmingly, especially by keeping from scoring.

Skunked: 1. To defeat overwhelmingly, especially by keeping from scoring.

Related posts:

109 comments

  1. njstuckintx

    Skunks don’t usually smell like rotten goose eggs, but I guess weirder things have happened.

  2. metsfan4decades

    I don’t know how the rest of the season is going to go….but for this series we got it done.
    We took care of business in our house and made those Phillies look pretty bad in the process.

    Job Well Done.

    1. fongy2

      2nd!!!
      Ya know it was nice to catch a good team,playing bad AND keep
      THAT going for them and take care of buisness.
      Too many times over the years
      we’ve run into bad teams playing well…..OR let a team
      like the Phils come in and get
      healthy again at our expense.

  3. njstuckintx

    Utley looked pretty bad this series. IE, looked like he was hurting, and not just a little. Should he go down and Placebo not maintain his pace for contributing, their offense, sans Vicky, Howard and Worth, are going to start looking quite suspect.

    1. fongy2

      Like us last season,if you take
      a couple of your best players
      out of the lin-up and/or a couple of your top role guys,
      the line-up doesn’t look too dangerous.
      The likes of Francisco,Valdez
      and Scheider don’t make for a
      scarey 6,7&8 in almost any line-up.
      Utley b/t/w has been real sick lately with the flu and no doubt looked lost at the plate.
      KRod’s 1-0 fastfall down and in
      which he just looked at is an
      example.

      1. njstuckintx

        Yeah, he didn’t look so good in the face. Pretty pale. Could well be the case.

        I like the consistent lineup we’ve been rocking. I’m content with it and if there is a Beltran sighting some time down the line, it’s only gravy. I think this team feels the same way. And I can’t see where Frenchy is not the odd man out. Pagan really looks like he’s realized his potential. He had such a sweet catch last night. Who knows, maybe even slot Beltran in RF to ease his knee?

        1. trs86

          It’s possible. I think they will most likely just slide Pagan to RF but shade him towards Beltran.

          1. njstuckintx

            Either way, that is the problematic questions I prefer dealing with vs. which #5 pitcher we are looking to scrape off the pile this week.

          2. fongy2

            Yeah out of respect for Beltrans
            history AND contract
            BUT who knows how well
            he’ll be running when…
            if he returns.

  4. udontmesswthejohan

    Great series. Terrific.

    I think this series only underscores the importance of one, Jose Reyes to this teams long term success, and I hope that those fans who foolishly argue taht he is a candidate to be traded away have taken note.

    We all love David, but the truth is that Reyes is the straw that stirs this drink. So much so, that I think this team relies too heavily on him at times, and when he isn’t hitting they almost use it as an excuse, for why the rest of the lineup isn’t doing it’s part.

    Anyway, like I said, great series. Onward and upward.

    1. fongy2

      Agreed completely!
      This has been my mantra for years now, through the yrs of great production from Wright,
      Beltran AND Delgado….Reyes
      is the most important player
      we’ve had in our line-up since
      Straw.

  5. metsfan4decades

    Interesting post this morning on Beerleaguer. J. Weitzel concludes this post with:

    ‘Three straight shutouts, on the road, against a team that implicated the Phillies in sign stealing. I would be lying if I said this sudden, uncharacteristic dearth of scoring wasn’t curious. Whether it means the supply line has been shut off at the source, or that the accusations somehow made the Phillies sheepish and tentative, whatever the case, and in my opinion, I do not believe these circumstances are unrelated.’

    Whether it’s true or not, not only did we sweep the Phillies, we’ve successfully put doubts in the minds of it’s fan base on just why that offense was previously so good.

    LGM!

    1. fongy2

      Really I’m not so sure about their fans doubting the team
      BUT my wife did say twice during lastnights gm, “the Phils look stunned in their dugout.”
      Also, not just with this Phillie sign stealing thing
      but for as long as I can remember, I think sign stealing
      is one of the most overrated things in the game.
      I’ve always found it hard to believe it has much if any impact on the game.

      1. trs86

        Yeah, as a non-player I have no idea. However, the binocular guy was there for a reason.

        1. fongy2

          Oh, no doubt BUT
          to think someone
          in CF can steal
          the sign relay back to the dugout,they can then relay it to
          the 3B Coach AND
          THEN he can relay to the hitter,WHILE the
          hitter still trying to figure out the
          regular signs from the Coach
          AND still study the pitcher AND
          just get himself set at the plate AND relax….All within a couple
          seconds……
          Well, a little difficult to believe.

          1. trs86

            I think it’s more about scouting. They can study the signs from there and then use the closer players to steal them later.

            Kind of like the binoculars guy is breaking the code if that makes sense.

          2. metsfan4decades

            I won’t pretend either to know how you could steal signs over and over quick enough to make a difference.
            But the evidence certainly pointed to the attempt to do just that.

            As you said, sign stealing has been part of the game for almost forever. It’s just the arrogance of making it so blatantly obvious AND getting caught that makes this taking them down a couple of pegs just that much sweeter…

  6. CaseStreet

    Since the mets broke the record for fastest from first to last, maybe they can break the last to first record.
    LGM!

  7. fongy2

    While that was a very enjoyable series
    AND I think it allows the Mets to know
    that they can indeed compete with and
    beat The Phils BUT I think Omar needs
    to step up his efforts to acquire a SPer AND maybe address RF. Frenchy
    looks like hes returned to being the player he was before the Braves traded
    him.

    1. ceetar

      And there is no doubt a pitcher would come here, like many seem to have doubted a week ago. 10 games out. ha!

      1. njstuckintx

        I’m thinking with Big Pelf playing like BIGGER PELF (and some TRS whispering in my ear) we’ll prob looking at a Millwood type #4 pitcher coming here.

        I can’t see Oswalt going anywhere else than St. Lou (where are they going to get the money) or the Dodgers (divorce court!). If he did want to win, NY is the place to be! (ok, my opinion, not others around the country), but I lean more and more to the not waving the NTC to come NY Bound.

        1. trs86

          Just not sure what will happen with Oswalt. I could see a Peavy situation where he refuses only to accept later. However, I would be just as happy with a guy like Millwood that we are not anchored too past this season. Besides Millwood, while not as talented, is a horse. Goes deep in almost every game and is leading the AL in innings.

          1. Kingman 26

            Absolutely and positively agree.

            The Wilpons won’t pay for Roy Harvey Oswalt anyway, and he is aging, and Millwood would be absolutely perfect for a much-less pricey stop-gap.

          2. fongy2

            Plus Oswalt’s politics may be too divisive in the Mets clubhouse…..Just sayin’

          3. trs86

            Money for Oswalt in my opinion has nothing to do with it as the Mets always add a high priced guy anyway. He would just be the SP they add in the “off-season”. But yeah I like Millwood.

          4. Kingman 26

            They don’t always add a high-priced guy mid-season; in fact rarely do they.

            And the Wilpons cut payroll and word is that they will not increase it in-season this year.

            Hope I am wrong, but probably not on this one.

          5. njstuckintx

            I hope you are wrong too. I almost hope Beltran is out long enough they can collect workmans comp on him.

          6. trs86

            I am saying in the off-season Kingman.
            Just saying that if they got Oswalt now then it would be the high priced FA for next year.

            They did not intentionally cut payroll by as much as it came out.

            Again they made very fair offers to Pinerio and Molina and were wise enough not to panic when they wanted more. That’s 14-15M right there.

          7. Kingman 26

            Gotcha, sorry; misunderstood.

            I am sure you know my thoughts on the 2-ace situation, and with Roy Harvey, we might have three.

    2. trs86

      But Fongy if Reyes, Bay, Wright, Davis do their job then you can handle a 7/8 hitter not being very productive. He is very solid on defense. They also have Carter. I can’t believe that this slump is the real Frenchy. This slump is much worse than even his career numbers. If he can even return to .268 .309 .428 .737 out of the 7/8 spot playing solid defense I am not concerned.

      1. njstuckintx

        Yeah, he did save a run or 2 this weekend based on his arm. But, as I mentioned above, the only way we address RF is when/if Beltran returns. And if he does, stick Beltran in RF.

        1. trs86

          Yeah when/if Beltran returns I expect Frenchy to lose time regardless of where Beltran plays RF or CF.

      2. fongy2

        Yeah, I like him AND was one of the few who defended and gave credit to omar for the
        deal b/c he’s just a better player with more talent than Church
        BUT he is lost up there. Swings for the fences every time he offers at a pitch and
        seems to have no idea what situational hitting is.
        With Wright having a bad time and since I look atDavis as anything you get is gravy,if something was available,I think Omar really has to look at it.
        I’m not saying justcut him or anything BUT you can’t be thinking
        contract extention with this guy and if thats the case AND someone has an OFer making money …Well..
        you got to seriously give it a long look see.

        1. trs86

          Like I said from a 7/8 hitter I am not too concerned. If they found a LH platoon guy better than Carter, sure.

        2. Kingman 26

          Yeah, Frenchy is a good hustling guy, but this seems to be the real him offensively. If he can stay hidden in the 7 or 8 hole, he is passable, but the future might be Bay, FMart, and Pagan in the OF.

          Beltran?

          LOL!!!!!!

          1. trs86

            Fmart?

            LOL!!!!!!

          2. njstuckintx

            Fmart? Is he still a Met?

          3. Kingman 26

            FMart is 21 and does not have 100 million in the bank; he surely is actually working to get healthy.

            Reyes was injury-prone as a kid too.

            We will be seeing young FMart next spring, and maybe he will play well enough so that Beltran can be a platoon player for his walk year, and he and Boras’ revolting strategy of not playing would be foiled in the most beautiful way possible.

          4. trs86

            I think we just need to settle down on the conspiracy theories here for Beltran.

            I do have to ask this question, if Beltran had no plans of working hard to get back then why did he push himself so much at the end of a lost season just to get back?

          5. Kingman 26

            Good question.

            My guess is that what happened after the end of the season changed everything.

            Obviously none of us know, but seriously, what has the guy been doing for almost six months now?

            Do you really think, given Boras’ history, and Beltran’s age, injury history, and contract status, that it is completely impossible that Boras has advised him to play as little as possible this year and to be as healthy as possible for his walk year in 2011 when he will surely be seeking another massive contract?

            I would respectfully say that it is indeed a very possible scenario.

          6. trs86

            No I think it’s possible but I also think the Mets would not allow it and would make a huge fuss about it. I am sure they are they have representatives there for the workouts and are speaking with the doctors about his issue. I know their silence is making us question things but I think we are making a bigger deal out of it than it really is. Remember that he did not have that surgery until mid-January, we can debate as to why.

          7. Kingman 26

            Agreed largely with all of this….just a bit tantalizing (and useless of course) to imagine a fully productive Beltran since opening day and a Pagan/Frenchy platoon in right.

            We might be in first place right now.

          8. trs86

            Very possible.

      3. udontmesswthejohan

        I agree he gives you good D and, by all accounts is a good guy in the clubhouse, but I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for him to come out of this slump in any big way if I were you TRS.

        1. trs86

          Well I would expect a return to the norm Udon’t. If a career .268 .309 .428 .737 is hitting .148 .198 .198 .395 the last 28 days then something has to give.

          1. udontmesswthejohan

            Yeah, I hear ya, he will probably come back to those numbers a bit, but I don’t think we are ever going to see the guy who originally came up with the Braves. At this point, he is what he is. Or lets hope he is, and not something less.

  8. Kingman 26

    Very interesting and very amazing…maybe the Phils’ aren’t such fabulous hitters when they don’t know what pitch is coming. Hmmmmm….

    Incredible, amazing series, and Warthen deserves serious props if he was largely behind Pelf’s developing that out pitch.

    Loved the Barajas, Takahashi, and Igarashi signings, and if the Wilpons really put the kibosh on big spending outside of Bay, then Don Omar does deserve serious credit for bringing these guys in. Especially Barajas, who has been incredible.

    To me, the next six games are the biggest since the end of 2008 at least. If they can keep this train rolling and win 4 of 6 in two places where we have not played our best ball, then this is truly for real.

    And it is time for the people who called Bay “defensively challenged” and judged him based on the hugely flawed and asinine UZR rating for Fenway to step up—it is now almost TWO YEARS since Bay has made an error, and he is a good left fielder.

    1. fongy2

      Agreed,especially with your thoughts on Bay!
      You know brock, I’m old school and stats have their place BUT
      Bay’s been a corner OFer all his life, he knows how to read
      a flyball off the Bat,has average speed and an average arm…..All equals at least
      an average MLB OFer….If not
      better.

      1. Kingman 26

        I repeated till I was blue (and orange) in the damn face that there is NO WAY that a guy who had one error and 19 assists in 200 games in LF in Fenway could be even mediocre, let alone bad.

        Some new stat ideas like using OPS instead of BA to judge offense and using WHIP instead of wins to judge pitchers are accurate and useful, but if UZR states that Bay is mediocre or bad, it is a useless, mockable stat, at least in certain cases.

        1. trs86

          Any stat this is based on one persons judgment or can be “recalculated” to suddenly make a “terrible” fielder into above average is basically worthless.

    2. njstuckintx

      yeah man, bay looks more than compatent out there.

    3. trs86

      Like I said making more than fair offers to Molina and Pinerio yet refusing to budge did not show being cheap it showed being wise.

      1. fongy2

        It would be nice to
        have that 12mil Ollie’s getting to
        hunt for a SPer!

        1. trs86

          While that’s true, that’s in the past. The Mets have shown a little bit more financial responsibility, not being cheap.

      2. Kingman 26

        + Infinity

  9. fongy2

    Just curious, did the SNY broadcast note when the last time we swept a 3game series,winning all by shutout?
    I go back to ’73/’74 and can’t remember us sweeping a series and not allowing the other team to score.

    1. Kingman 26

      1969 vs the Phils—Seaver, Kossman, Gentry/Ryan I believe….

      1. fongy2

        Thanks….Before my time!!!…..Unfortunately,not LONG before my time.
        Man,do I feel my age lately!

        1. Kingman 26

          That makes two of us on all counts!

          The 1973 playoffs are my oldest really concrete memories.

          1. fongy2

            Yeah,
            mine too!
            The ’74 season
            was the first I remember
            actually following the team daytoday

      2. metsfan4decades

        They did say, it was ’69 against the Phils and it was Seaver, Koosman and Gentry.

    2. Mr North Jersey

      1969 Fongy vs the phillies after Mets clinched.

      Koosman complete game shutout Mets win 5-0
      http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI196909260.shtml

      Seaver complete game shutout Mets win 1-0
      http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI196909270.shtml

      Gary Gentry, Nolan Ryan, and Bob Taylor combined shutout Mets win 2-0
      http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PHI/PHI196909280.shtml

      1. fongy2

        Wow!…Thx for the links.
        Talk about names!!…
        Looks like the Phils
        we’re ready for the off-season.

  10. rustyjr

    Anybody think greinke is available ? If so what package might it take to get him ?

    1. fongy2

      No!…..And if he was they’d wanna START with Ike And Jenrry!

      1. njstuckintx

        Would you do that Fongy?

        1. fongy2

          No chance!
          Greike is very,very good
          BUT considering his struggles
          with social anxiety disorder…
          playing in NYC
          under the daily microscope….
          No thanks!

          1. njstuckintx

            agreed! He’d be in the corner wimpering at 1 bad out after reading this blog! :)

      2. Kingman 26

        Ike and Jennry must be considered untouchables.

        Maybe in ALL cases.

        This team, regardless of what ultimately happens this year, is poised to be a powerhouse within 1–2 years. Must not diminish the Junior Core.

        I would not trade Wright, Reyes, Pelf, Ike, or Jennry.

        Maybe anyone else at this point. But Bay and Feliciano are probably huge parts of the next couple of years too.

        1. Mr North Jersey

          I’d show caution when throwing words like powerhouse around not to say that it is wrong just that so much has yet to be known before such anyone knows what this team is poised to be.

          1. Kingman 26

            I sure agree.

            But, considering their age and incredible lack of experience above AA ball, wouldn’t you have to say that the first two Junior Core arrivals of Ike and Mejia show two guys who could both be future stars, if not at least very solid starters?

            Throw in a couple more successes from Niese/FMart/Thole/Niewenhuis etc, with Wright/Bay/Reyes/Johan/Pelf/KRod/Feliciano and the serious potential of Igarashi and Takahashi, not to mention the possible taking on of more payroll if the team keeps winning and the Wilpons’ income increases, and I think that we are looking at a real good team next year, and in 2012 with Slappy and Ollie’s salary gone and the Junior Core maturing?

            I like 2012.

          2. Mr North Jersey

            What Niese, Davis and Mejia have are potential to be good players. I do not want to get ahead of myself at labeling them anything more than that.

            I still see another kid’s early success (Murphy) was used to project him as a piece of the puzzle that would help us win in 2009.

            FMart/Thole/Niewenhuis etc, have a book that has yet to be written and if only 1 of them achieve the success that many believe they can Mets will have a solid player for years to come.

        2. rustyjr

          What about buhrle ?

          1. njstuckintx

            Creme Buhrle?

          2. Kingman 26

            He would be welcomed here by me!

          3. trs86

            Don’t see them trading him.

          4. fongy2

            They won’t AND I’ve heard him say if he ever was traded,he’d only want to pitch in StLouis.

    2. trs86

      Nope.

  11. ceetar

    time to switch gears? Brewers suck!

    1. Kingman 26

      They sure do, despite the rather impressive coaching braintrust they have assembled.

      To me, that is why this series is so damn huge.

      We MUST win 2 of 3 in Milwaukee.

      1. trs86

        I am not sure it’s a must but right now it’s a should.

        1. Kingman 26

          Agreed, and in some ways it is almost the same thing—if they are indeed really together and improved and not just coming off the usual Skank/Phaillie momentum, they sure should win 2 (or 3) of 3.

          1. fongy2

            I’ll be disapointed with
            anything less than 4of6 from Mil&SD

    2. rustyjr

      I can see us taking 2 outta 3 against the old milwaukee team

      1. Kingman 26

        Even with Champagne Willie and Rick “The Jacket” Peterson in the dugout?

        Peterson is like 7 minutes away from fixing all of the Brewers’ pitcher I think….

        1. fongy2

          Yeah, nice off-season moves by
          The Brew-Crew throwing tons of Cash @ Wolf
          to be their Ace AND Hawkins to be their 8th inning guy for
          Hoffman!!???
          Yeah,THAT didn’t
          have disapointment written ALL OVER
          IT…..

        2. njstuckintx

          Considering their pitching is absolutely falling apart, the jacket better get a fleece liner and soon. He’ll be out on the street sooner than later.

        3. ceetar

          Still better than our duo.

          Two Santana starts and a Pelf. A split of these 6 is almost mandatory to start.

  12. fongy2

    The guys Omar may have a chance at are Millwood and Westbrook.
    I’d take either…..On the cheap!
    Get Danny Murphy healthy And move him for one of these guys!

    1. trs86

      You know the O’s and Indians would look at Murphy for sure. Not sure how much more it would take.

      I will say that I read the Indians were currently not shopping Westbrook because they want to re-sign him.

      1. fongy2

        Clear attempt to drive up the asking price!

        1. trs86

          Perhaps. Could also be that they don’t want to eat the cash to trade him.

          1. fongy2

            Why would they have to eat cash to trade him?

          2. trs86

            Owed 11M and coming off an injury. Most teams would not give a top prospect AND pay that much for a guy that is an injury concern. Well that was the thoughts on the article I read. The guy has not been healthy for a full season since 2006.

          3. fongy2

            Yeah, i know.I’d think THATS why if you offered a quasi-prospect like Murph AND took on the contract they’d be happy to move him.

          4. trs86

            That’s what I am saying. The thoughts were that they would rather keep him and ride him until the off-season and have a better chance re-signing him than to get a middling prospect. They mentioned that Wood was very likely to be traded but Westbrook not yet. Now if he pitched very well in between now and July 31st they may be able to get a better prospect.

          5. fongy2

            My point is,I’m not sure they’d want to re-sign him with his injury history,them cutting salary AND them re-building.

          6. trs86

            Very true. Unless they think that would help them re-sign him. Like I said, right now they are saying he is not available. I have no clue if to believe them.

  13. GravediggerHebner

    The FAN just played a bit of the Phils radio broadcast from last night, specifically the Jose Reyes 2-run double. I paraphrase:

    Play-by-play guy: “That could be trouble, into the corner 2 runs score Reyes on second.”

    Color man (Larry Andersen): “And there’s Reyes at second with all his antics, and the Phillies must like them because they’re not doing anything about them.”

    1. Mr North Jersey

      LoL Yeah I heard it also Grave.

    2. trs86

      It’s unbelievable how one fanbase/organization can be so blind to themselves. I am amazed how they notice Reyes and watch his every move but ignore guys like Vicki.

    3. fongy2

      Larry Andersen is as he was a
      player….A clown!
      Heb, i watched every pitch of
      the series listening to the Phil TV ‘Casters, Sarge,Wheels
      And McCarthey AND they had nothing but praise for Reyes
      and all he does for the Mets.
      Noting more than once,”He really brings life to the Mets”.

      1. fongy2

        b/t/w, I think they’re
        also seeing how the energy of their own team has been reduced by not having Rollins
        at the top of their order….AND in their duggout.

  14. fongy2

    Also, I LOVE Pagan in the 6hole!
    It really provides speed and the threat of same to the later portion
    of the line-up.
    It’s what make the Phils so dangerous
    when Rollins is hitting 1 and Victorino 6.

    1. trs86

      If Frenchy was hitting then I would rather have Pagan 2nd but while Wright and Frenchy are struggling it makes perfect sense.

    2. GravediggerHebner

      Can’t argue with that.

      Fongy did you happen to catch any of Marlins-Braves during the Mets delay? Weird incident last night.

      With 2 outs in the bottom of the 1st Tim Hudson hit Hanley Ramirez in the front shoulder with the 1st pitch. Hanley kind of walked around behind the plate, IMO calming himself down, then went to 1st base.

      Took off for 2nd on the 1st pitch and stole it on a really close play, replays showed he was out IMO but was called safe then appeared to be yelling at Hudson from 2nd base.

      Then Cantu laced a single to center and Hanley scored, appeared to be yelling at Hudson all the way from 3rd to home and after he crossed home on the way to the dugout.

      The announcers were speculating whether there was any history between the two players, couldn’t think of any but thought maybe Hanley had admired a HR the night before and Hudson didn’t like it. I guess I was wondering if Hudson is the kind of guy who might hit Hanley just because of the whole previous lack of hustle and calling his manager out after gettnig benched thing, you have any thoughts on that?

      1. fongy2

        I did see it.
        Don’t know of any history w/Hudson and ramirez however,Bobby Cox and Freddi gonzalez ar very close
        so….Bobby Cox is obviously old school so,
        ya never know.
        I think though that it
        might be more that Ramirez is a little full of himself and seems a little un-hinged right now.

        1. njstuckintx

          Yeah, he’s prob. under the impression that his defication is of the potpouri fragrance.

          1. fongy2

            Errrr,
            now THAT
            provides a REAL
            bad mental image!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *