«

»

Jun 11

Video: Rosenthal Discusses If The Mets Are A Team Built For The Long Haul In The N.L.

<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/msn.foxsports.com/video?vid=b2902309-009b-49ca-b71b-bd10b6c84e86');" href="http://msn.foxsports.com/video?vid=b2902309-009b-49ca-b71b-bd10b6c84e86" target="_new" title="">NL Hot Corner: Leake on fire</a>

Related posts:

33 comments

  1. GravediggerHebner

    Geez Ken change your mind much? Didn’t he say less than a week ago that the Mets were “not true contenders?”

    Now he’s saying they need to add a big time pitcher to the trio of Santana/Pelfrey/Niese? The implication being those guys are big time pitchers. What team has 4 big time pitchers?

    I swear to God he makes this stuff up as he goes along. He speaks slowly enough he should be able to come up with better BS than this during his stilted monologues.

    1. Mr North Jersey

      His grin as he takes a jab at the NL when he says all you need is a pulse in the NL to be built for the long haul is what irked me the most.

      It just shows you that it’s not what you know but who you know. Because Rosenthal I think just reads what he sees come across the AP Wire.

      1. Kingman 26

        He works for Fox. Facts and knowledge have zero role in their news operations. Just getting attention; that is all that matters.

        1. Mr North Jersey

          :-)

        2. trs86

          Fox SPORTS!!!

          :)

          1. GravediggerHebner

            “We report the scores, you decide who won”

          2. Kingman 26

            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

            BEST comment EVER!

          3. prismo

            “Fox Sports: As Fair and Balanced as the Yankees’ Payroll”

          4. Kingman 26

            HAHA!!

            Damn, you guys are really bringing it today!

          5. Kingman 26

            Yeah, I know TRS…sorry, should not have opened this can of worms!

            :-)

          6. trs86

            Nah I know how Fox loves to sensationalize everything. My point is always that they are to make things more fair and balanced. Not that they actually are fair and balanced.

          7. Kingman 26

            Whew….hoping I would not tick you off there Chief!

          8. trs86

            Contrary to popular belief that’s a very hard thing to do.

          9. Kingman 26

            That is definitely not my belief at all…I think you are VERY patient and tolerant and utterly reasonable.

    2. Kingman 26

      LOL!

      I truly would sooner listen to paint dry or watch grass grown than listening to this dishonest fickle numbskull.

    3. metsfan4decades

      Rosenthal just annoys the hell out of me. He’s the geek of baseball analysts.
      BP in flux? Yeah, like that Philly BP down the turnpike is oh so settled and dominant. I truly don’t see their starting rotation any better than ours either. As a matter of fact, I think ours IS better….

  2. GravediggerHebner

    I have to say though that I do like the headline that shows up on the video sometimes when I refresh the blog: Leake on fire

    Tee Hee!

    1. njstuckintx

      If the follow up story headline is “The Pen is illin’”, then there’s your answer to Leake on fire.

      Too much of a stretch?

      1. GravediggerHebner

        No that’s very good, made me smile out loud.

        I don’t know the html code for that big grinning smile though so I can only give you the regular one.


        Compliments of MNJ

        1. njstuckintx

          I thought it was colon capital “D”.

          :D no?

  3. Mr North Jersey

    If we could have a celebrity death match who would win between Ken Rosenthal and Buster Olney?

    1. Kingman 26

      Neither one of them could hit hard enough to inflict damage.

      It would be a whiny slap-fight with no serious injuries.

    2. trs86

      Actually it would never take place the rumor would have been completely false and we would all just be sitting there waiting for something that was never likely to happen anyway.

    3. metsgirl31

      Are you kidding??? I’m a girl and I could make ‘em BOTH cry.

      1. Mr North Jersey

        LoL, Someone get that Lady a drink!

      2. GravediggerHebner

        Nice!

  4. oleosmirf

    i think he’s right though…right now Dickey is doing well but Takahashi might be overexposed now and Maine and Ollie are certainly not answers so they do need a SP.

    more importantly I think we need more help in the bullpen…and the answers are not in house. We need 1 reliable arm there to go along with Feliciano, K-Rod, Takahashi, Dessens and Mejia

    1. GravediggerHebner

      Yes to be fair I felt Rosenthal’s bullpen point was a valid one. But the dude is all over the map, it’s as if anything he may have said the day (or week) before simply doesn’t exist anymore.

      1. prismo

        I agree Grave. The bullpen point was his only that I agree with.

        The way Pelfrey’s pitching this season, and Niese’s last two starts, and then Santana…the Mets may have three extremely solid starters. How many teams can say that? Certainly less than half.

        However, I must admit…if they traded for Lee and had a 1-4 of Santana/Pelfrey/Lee/Niese, I would have to think it’s the best rotation in baseball. I hope I’m not too biased in thinking that. Three cy-young caliber pitchers.

        1. oleosmirf

          Niese’s last 2 starts have been spectacular but lets not anoint him a top starter right now…he still needs to prove he can be good consistently…

          I would like to see us get a millwood type to be the #3/4 SP and acquire a proven reliever to solidify the 8th inning…

    2. ceetar

      That’s more than most teams have. It’d be nice, but they can get by. Bullpen’s are a very fluid thing. Takahashi will be there shortly as Maine is likely returning. Perez likely will be back as well.

      1. oleosmirf

        Takahashi going back is not enough…it might not be a problem now but it will be come december…

        1. oleosmirf

          September that is :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *