«

»

Jun 17

Mejia for Lee?

Boom or Bust? Trade Mejia for Lee.

Boom or Bust? Trade Mejia for Lee.

Matthew (what happened to just Matt?) Cerrone asks, “Would you trade Mejia in a deal to get Lee?”

According to Dave Cameron at fangraphs.com, Cliff Lee’s trade value is:

If you’re a GM shopping for Cliff Lee this summer, that looks to be the price – $15 to $20 million worth of value, which translates into one high quality prospect and a few fillers.

Mejia does fit that high quality prospect role but could the Mets get Lee for Mejia and a few fillers?

Dave Cameron also moonlights as the British Prime Minister

Dave Cameron also moonlights as the British Prime Minister

On U.S.S. Mariner, Dave Cameron also took a stab at where Lee might end up:

So, really, I see two teams that make sense on most levels – the Mets and the Twins.

The Mets have the glaring need, with only three big league starters on their roster and a GM whose job is almost certainly on the line. Omar Minaya has shown a willingness to give up a bushel of prospects for an arm he believes could put him over the top, as he did when he traded Lee (along with Grady Sizemore and Brandon Phillips) to Cleveland for Bartolo Colon. The Mets have spent a lot of money to try and win, and yet, they are one starting pitcher short of being a legitimate contender. Lee would give them a real chance at grabbing the NL East title and playing well in October. And in Jenrry Mejia, they have the kind of dynamic young pitching prospect who the Mariners would see as a valuable long term piece who could also potentially be part of the 2011 rotation. The Mets could put together a strong offer for Lee built around Mejia. There’s a potential deal to be made there.

Okay, so Mejia and a few fillers might get it done, though Cameron likes a deal with the Twins more. Assuming Mejia and a few fillers can get it done, is there anyone else available that could help the Mets?

How does Broadway Roy sound?

How does Broadway Roy sound?

Buster Olney at ESPN.com thinks the Mets will have many options including Roy Oswalt, Cliff Lee, Jake Westbrook,  Ben Sheets and Fausto Carmona:

But no matter whom they target, it appears that the Mets — one of the few buyers in a buyers’ market — are going to get somebody good.

Also, don’t forget about Cuban defector Yuniesky Maya who is free to sign with a major league club.

Finally, friend of the blog, Joe D of Mets Merized Online makes the argument for trading Jon Niese for Cliff Lee:

Would you trade Jon Niese for Cliff Lee to increase the Mets odds of winning the division, going to the playoffs and having a chance for a third World Series victory for the Mets?

Or do you keep Niese and keep your fingers crossed that Oliver Perez and John Maine return to form and carry the Mets to the post season?

I’m leaning toward going after Lee…

Mr. One Hitter

Mr. One Hitter

So what say you? Should the Mets:

Trade for Lee? Who do you give up? If not, then do you trade for Oswalt? Maybe you like some of the other guys Olney mentioned or Maya. Or maybe you want to stand pat and give Ollie and Maine another chance.

Related posts:

96 comments

  1. oleosmirf

    i have been reluctant in the past but if you can get Lee and give up Mejia, Tejada and other prospects from a list that doesnt include Niese, Davis, Havens, Nieuwenhuis, Flores or F-Mart then you have to make that move no questions asked.

    1. njstuckintx

      And if he walks, you get 2 picks. I’m still not sure how I feel about the whole deal.

      1. oleosmirf

        not only that but the Mets go out and sign the next best available FA SP so you still have a great rotation

  2. prismo

    I would absolutely trade Mejia for Lee (obviously not straight up). Regardless of where Mejia’s true potential may lie, it should be clear to everyone that the Mets think he’s more valuable as a mediocre middle reliever than as a starting pitcher prospect.

    However, I would absolutely NOT trade Jon Niese for Lee. Niese is off to a very solid year, and the Mets can keep him cheaply for several years to come. Lee may be great this year, but then could head off to free agency elsewhere, leaving the Mets with two draft picks instead of a solid starter (Niese) for years to come.

    A rotation of Santana/Pelfrey/Lee/Niese/Dickey is just absurdly good. Adding to that, in a playoff series 90% of the games would be started by Santana, Pelfrey, or Lee.

    1. oleosmirf

      for this franchise, especially after 3 depressing seasons, making the playoffs is so crucial…even if it means signing Lee to a possibly dangerous contract…the short term gains are so great…

    2. GravediggerHebner

      Prismo put it better than I ever could. I second his response.

    3. Kingman 26

      I completely agree.

      If Mejia is the only top prospect we trade, and we then do not sign Lee to an outrageous deal, and we get two draft picks (Mike Hampton leaving netted a draft pick that became David Wright and Hampton helped us get to the WS), DO IT.

      And Oleo’s right too.

      Making the playoffs this year, regardless of what happens IN the playoffs, with the talent we have and have on the way, puts this team in just amazing position for 2011, a la the 2007 Phils.

  3. DNDJohan aka kistics

    The thing about Lee is that he’s relatively cheap this season. So no doubt teams other than Twins or Mets will get in the race.

    I still think Oswalt is the better choice. Not because he’s a better pitcher (I think Lee is a better pitcher), but prospect cost will be much less as long as the Mets are willing to take on his contract.

    1. CaseStreet

      Click on the USS Mariner link, Dave does a good job of explaining how many teams don’t make sense, either because they are non-contenders, need hitters instead or don’t have the prospects that can help the Mariners in 2011.

      1. GravediggerHebner

        Without even clicking the link I remember some suggestions that SEA is looking for a serious catching prospect and I think at least subjectively that the Twins have the edge over us in that regard with the kid being blocked by Mauer (Ramos?) seemingly being a more attractive prospect than Thole.

        1. DNDJohan aka kistics

          I guess if the Mets offered up Thole, Mejia and someone, it’s not a bad offer…

      2. DNDJohan aka kistics

        Heyman had one article that listed potential suitors for Lee/Oswalt.

        Basically the point was that there are no one that wants to take Oswalt’s contract, so everyone is looking at Lee.

        Which really should work benefit towards the Mets getting Oswalt. But then numerous reports say that the Mets are not that interested in Oswalt.

        1. DNDJohan aka kistics

          Here’s Heyman’s link

          http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/jon_heyman/06/14/oswalt.lee/index.html

        2. stickguy

          I would much prefer, of course, that the Mets ate a contract and preserved better prospects. Because it ain’t my money!

          The Mets seemed to have some FA budget left they never spent. Well, now is the time to spend it.

          and still save the farm.

          Get Maya for some depth too. That can be the money they didn’t spend on the draft.

  4. metsfan4decades

    This is a tough one for me. Depends on who we have to give up. I’m reluctant to give up Mejia not knowing what we have. Couple that with it’s for a half year rental, unless we can get Lee to sign an extension. And how many years would that extension be? 5 seems to be the consensus. Five years makes me nervous as well.
    I guess for me, this would depend on who else we have to give up with Mejia to get Lee.

    I absolutely would not trade Niese for Lee. He’s not a prospect anymore, he’s in the starting rotation to stay. And he should stay.

    I take a strong objection to this point though:
    ‘The Mets have spent a lot of money to try and win, and yet, they are one starting pitcher short of being a legitimate contender.’
    ***********
    If we’re one SP short of being a legit contender, then what the hell is Philly? They have less of a SP rotation right now than we do.

    If Maya looks solid, he’d only cost us the $$ and no prospects.

    1. metsfan4decades

      It probably also all depends on what the priorities are too. Is it winning a WS this year and figure out the rotation next year when Lee walks? Or is it to stay a contender for the next several years?

      Philly gave up prospects for 1/2 season of Lee – they only got as far as the WS. They then gave up more for Halladay. They’ve got not much in the way of AAA ready talent now, some big contracts, and some even bigger holes at the major league level. They went for the win now with Lee and just fell short.
      If we’re giving up Mejia, here’s hoping we’re not sending 1 or 2 of our other better prospects as well.

      1. oleosmirf

        if Lee walks Omar signs the next best SP on the market…

  5. CaseStreet

    BTW, anyone know how to put up a poll? I can’t.

    1. njstuckintx

      1. dig hole
      2. put pole in hole
      3. fill in hole

      1. CaseStreet

        lol, I tried putting up a chain link fence once. Not as easy as you may think, though, probably easier than getting up a poll here.

        1. GravediggerHebner

          I’ve never done it but I seem to recall something about doing it in the NLEC forums and linking to it here, as opposed to doing it here directly.

      2. stickguy

        make sure to add some redimix cement too. It will keep the pole upright longer.

    2. DNDJohan aka kistics

      MC blog is already running a poll on Mejia for Lee I think…

      1. CaseStreet

        yup, that’s where I got the idea for the post. I just do a better job of putting it all into perspective :)

        1. DNDJohan aka kistics

          agreed

    3. Mr North Jersey

      Polldaddy account Case.

      1. CaseStreet

        tnx Jerz

      2. CaseStreet

        didn’t work. I think we need the polldaddy plugin.
        Here’s the pole:
        [polldaddy poll="3359796"]

  6. oleosmirf

    what are the chances Mejia becomes a better pitcher then what Lee would give us for the next 3 years????

    1. stickguy

      except you only get Lee for 2-3 months, not 3 years.

      Have to assume that in ST 2011, he is elsewhere, and you have the same issues filling out the rotation (just without Mejia + to pick from).

      1. oleosmirf

        do you really think Omar is not going to sign a marquee free agent in the offseason…he’s done it every year…

        1. stickguy

          he can sign lee in the off season even if he doesn’t trade for him.

          better off signing a different one though if lee walks, that way you get the pitcher + at least 1 extra draft pick.

          1. oleosmirf

            but getting Lee = guaranteed playoffs

          2. prismo

            Definitely not. Nothing is guaranteed playoffs!

  7. stickguy

    Well, it is hard to knw what the full spectrum of options really is.

    But, I am reluctant to trade Mejia for Lee. But if it happens, and there aren’t any other high end or mear by prospects involved, I will accept it and move on.

    But, 100% you do NOT trade neise for lee. just opens up another hole in the rotation, so you are giving up a very, very valuable commodity (young, cheap, good LHSP) for the marginal improvement between the 2. Not a good use of resources.

    And, I would rather trade mejia + the others (just assume it is the same package basically) for Haren, since he is under contract for reasonable money for another couple of years.

    finally, Oswalt scares me, but if the Mets decide to roll those dice, it better just involve $$ relief, and no prospects that hurt. Tejada + familia + stoner for Oswalt and his salary? Fine.

    and, if they do get Lee, treat it purely as a rental. Beat him like a C.C. mule down the stretch, and offer him arbitration. The guy will be 32 in August, and has had some injury issues. Offer him 3 years if you want, but be happy to take the 2 high picks when some other idiotic team gives him a 5/100 contract.

    1. oleosmirf

      while i would not trade Niese for Lee, to say the upgrade is marginal is extremely misguided…while his last 2 starts have been fantastic, lets not anoint him a star pitcher yet…

      1. stickguy

        the difference between the 2 is not going to be that great. maybe 1 run given up in 7 innings (which is about the diffrence in their ERAs).

        not insignificant, but not worth giving up a hugely valuable asset.

        Now, if yo are talking about adding a start pitcher to replace OLlie, that is a different story!

        1. oleosmirf

          again you are forgetting that Niese has not proven himself to be consistant yet…we all know he will be a top of the rotation guy…these last 3 starts have shown it…but we cannot assume he has turned the corner for good…

          1. stickguy

            way too crucial for the future though to trade him for the rental of another SP. Just can’t happen.

          2. oleosmirf

            o absolutely you should not think of trading him…but to say he is a stud pitcher in 2010 is way too premature…

          3. stickguy

            I didn’t say he was a stud.

            just using the numbers though, if he maintains ~3.5 ERA, and Lee keeps a 2.25, the difference is about 1 run per 7 inning start.

            how many wins is that worth (if they even oth keep up that pace)? Damned if I know! But at least in my mind, not enough to trade the future of neise for 2 months of.

            Given a choice, I want them BOTH in the rotation!

          4. oleosmirf

            just be cautious with Niese…im excited about his future but these last 3 starts have been against weak offensive teams…

            Lee can dominate any team on any day…cant say that about Niese yet…

  8. CaseStreet

    Yeah, I’d do Mejia for Lee.
    At worse, Lee becomes a free agent (after the Mets celebrate a WS Championship) and you can try to sign him (after all he just won the WS with the Mets and loves the team) or you pick up a guy like Vasquez (who needs to stay in the NL) and hope those draft picks are the Mike Pelfrey kind not the Phillip Humber kind.

    1. CaseStreet

      Plus Lee has a bone to pick with Philly.
      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_R57vNVIRmpg/SNQXmlPYUvI/AAAAAAAAAAw/i6X8bmGIOzI/s320/haloween+008.jpg

    2. stickguy

      well, that isn’t the worst or even close to it, but no need to lay out those ugly possibilities!

    3. Kingman 26

      Or hope the draft pick is the David Wright kind, as Mike Hampton became…..I want Lee just for this year.

      He will be pitching for his one giant deal, will be showing off everything he has, and the NL still won’t be used to him.

      Get him, use the hell out of him, then get the draft picks and let someone else sign him to an outrageous deal which he is not worth in the long term.

      1. CaseStreet

        if you’re gonna treat the guy like that at least give him the courtesy of a reach-around. sorry, I have a potty mouth :(

        1. Kingman 26

          OY!

      2. stickguy

        at least we still agree on something (your last line there!)

        1. Kingman 26

          Hey, I promise you will LOVE the 26-foot high bronze bust of Jerry I am having installed on the Float.

          Just kidding……

          1. stickguy

            then expect me to drive it under a 24′ overpass first chance I get…

          2. Kingman 26

            HAHAHA!!!

            :-)

    4. oleosmirf

      absolutely not to Vasquez…2 failed trips in NY is enough to pass on…he doesnt have the NY mentality…

      1. stickguy

        NY mentality? You really believe that?

        I would take him for sure in Queens at the right rpice, regardless of how he did with the yankees.

        Which actually was not that bad (his first trip, and even this one after about the first month).

        1. Kingman 26

          Oleo has not been wrong about much in 2010….

          1. njstuckintx

            As Public Enemy once said, There goes the neighborhood…

          2. rustyjr

            Uh that was body count

          3. GravediggerHebner

            Yeah, P.E. said:

            Suckas to the side
            I know you hate
            My 98

          4. njstuckintx

            Maybe I was thinking “hear the drumma get wicked…”

        2. oleosmirf

          then explain how someone who was so dominant with Atlanta is struggling in NY…its not the AL thing either he was great with the ChiSox

          except of course in the postseason where his ERA absolutely balloons…

          1. stickguy

            2004 28 NYY AL 14 10 .583 4.91 32 32 0 0 0 0 198.0 195 114 108 33 60 3 150 11 2 12 849 92 1.288 8.9 1.5 2.7 6.8 2.50 AS
            2005 29 ARI NL 11 15 .423 4.42 33 33 0 3 1 0 215.2 223 112 106 35 46 4 192 5 0 7 904 101 1.247 9.3 1.5 1.9 8.0 4.17
            2006 30 CHW AL 11 12 .478 4.84 33 32 0 1 0 0 202.2 206 116 109 23 56 2 184 15 0 7 872 98 1.293 9.1 1.0 2.5 8.2 3.29

            Well, I know that is illegible. Oops.

            But, in 2004 (his yankee year) he was 14-10. 4.91 era, and 1.28 whip. 92ERA+.

            next 2 years, very, very similar. almost identical numbers in 2006 with the white sox.

            Was that an Ariz mentality and a Chicago mentality too?

            basically, vazquez has always been wildly inconsistant. Atl was such a huge outlier career year, it is like aliens took over. same for his 2nd year in CHicago. 1st and 3rd mediocre, 2nd damned good.

            and 2009? It was like he had Halladay make all his starts for him. expecting that again, with his track record, at age 34 (at least), is taking really low odds.

            after his frist 3-4 starts this year, he has pretty much pitched like every other year. OK, not great.

          2. oleosmirf

            so then you want a wildly inconsistant pitcher????

            no thanks…ill pass…

  9. stickguy

    I still suspect that the addition (if there is one) will be more like westbrook/guthrie, and not a big name. ALthough I am still hoping for Haren!

    Not that I will be upset to see lee, just might not like the cost.

    also, if neise keeps pitching like he belongs for the next month or so (and I don’t expect any of these guys traded before then), I am also not worried about the theoretical playoff rotation.

    Neise can be the 2010 version of the 2008 Hamels. A young lefty with very little experience that can carry the team to the WS! The rest of that rotation was pretty underwhelming too (blanton, moyer, myers I think?)

    Oh yeah, get Myers if he can be had cheap. Could also fill in as the set up man Oleo so badly wants.

    1. oleosmirf

      the phillies also had statistically the best bullpen ever (mostly luck though) as well as a great lineup

  10. johan4cy

    I say trade mejia, F-Mart, and holt for Lee if it’s possible. The only one of those guys who I can see making some kind of impact in the Major leagues is mejia, and it’s well worth trading him for Lee. Imagine a playoff rotation of Lee, Johan, and Pelfrey. That would guarantee us a spot in the NLCS!

    1. stickguy

      mejia and f amrt is too much for a rental.

      and there are no guarantees in baseball.

      certainly no guarantee that Lee doesn’t come over, and get hurt again (those muscle issues can be nasty things)

      1. oleosmirf

        and what if Mejia never becomes a good pitcher?

      2. johan4cy

        With one top of the line pitcher, this team has a legitimate chance to win the World Series. I am fully willing to risk trading a future number 3 starter and an injury prone outfielder who hasn’t proven anything for that opportunity.

        1. johan4cy

          And I say that number 3 starter is probably an overstatement.

    2. Kingman 26

      I think we have to keep either Mejia or FMart. One of those guys is going to be good. I wish I knew which!

      A rotation of Johan, Lee, Pelf, and Niese as the big four is intoxicatingly enticing.

  11. stickguy

    one thing that bugs me about Lee, and all this talk of the mets having to gut the farm for him.

    he has been traded twice in the last year, and neither package included top prospects really. even at the time they wre not jaw dropping packages, so it isn’t just hindsight since the guys gotten in return (especailly what Seattle gave up) have pretty much all done nothing.

    and now, you are trading for 2-3 months of use, not even a full year, so that should downgrade the return.

    I would ba all on board trading them Tejada + gee + campbell say. But not Mejia and F Mart.

    1. oleosmirf

      its not gut the farm…its just Mejia and Tejada (who is not in our long term plans) and some fillers

      we still have Havens, Flores F-Mart, Niese, Davis, Thole, Nieuwenhuis, Harvey (when he signs)

      1. njstuckintx

        I think you’re right. But, I would also think Mejia and Tejada (and if you have to add in holt or the animal or someone) would get you Oswalt for sure, maybe with them picking up some of the tab. Maybe able to hold onto Mejia for Oswalt too. Which is more desireable?

      2. stickguy

        gutting the farm was in reposnse to the posters that were saying mejia + f mart + + +.

        at some point, you are giving up too much.

        and not just hping they all make the Mets, but because once you trade them, you can’t trade them for the next piece you need.

        Like a stud set-up man.

    2. CaseStreet

      I don’t think one high prospect plus some fillers is “gutting the farm”.

      Still, high is a relative word. Mejia isn’t exactly a top 10 prospect. He’s comparable to the top prospects that the Phillies and Mariners gave to get him.

      1. stickguy

        I can’t remember all the guys seattle gave up, just that one tall dude that had to get sent back to A ball. But I am pretty sure Mejia is rated higher, but maybe not.

  12. stickguy

    couple of idle thoughts:

    1) maybe Omar goes back to his old tricks, and pulls off a deal for a guy that no one sees coming? Maybe a package deal to fill a couple of holes (SP + 2B, SP + set up guy say).

    2) I am also wondering if Mejia being up was because they had him targetted all along as the chip that could land them a SP mid-season? This way, he is still an enticing young arm, but one that has shown flashes of holding his won already in the majors, as opposed to just being another kid in AA that can get out other kids?

    I don’t actually expect him to be traded (but I also don’t expect a super big name to be obtained), but IMO he is stil the best option to trade if you want a top talent back, and don’t want to trade a large number for higher end prospects.

    3) I still think he should be packaged to get Haren, since he is signed for 2/3 more years at reasonable numbers. Helps right now (playoff push), and also fills a major hole for 2011-2012/13, at an affordable rate.

    santana/haren/pelf/neise for the next 2.5 years, if they all stay healthy, could be huge, and certainly should make them contenders every year.

    even better, no need to chase after overpriced pitching in the off season. Just get filler #5/6 guys, and concentrate resources elsewhere.

    1. CaseStreet

      thing about Haren is it’ll cost our top 3 or 4 prospects because he is so cheap and has a few years left on the contract. We’d definitely be outbid.

      1. stickguy

        don’t really know. I don’t think he will be that bad (not 4 top prospects). He isn’t that cheap!

        So hard to do this speculation, since we have no idea what guys will really cost. Just like Santana required reyes+, right?

        Mejia + tejada + familia + gee? I really have no idea.

        And yes, I send that package over.

        1. oleosmirf

          I make that trade in a second for Haren or Lee…

  13. DNDJohan aka kistics

    Before addressing the SP situation, I truly think the Mets need BP help. It should be much tougher to find a legit 8th inning guy or a reliable BP arm, but I think BP should be the priority over SP.

    What do you guys think of Farnsworth? I know his stint with the Yanks wasn’t all that great, but looks like he’s doing well this season.

    1. saltygary

      ARGHHHH no Farnsworth NOOOOO

    2. metsfan4decades

      Uh, Heilman is doing well this season too but I don’t want to see him either.

    3. stickguy

      BP arms are fungible. If they can get someone cheap (talent wise), give it a shot.

      More likely they use the current bunch, and mix acosta and parnell back in.

      Although I would be fine if a deal brought back a legit set-up guy too.

      maybe a SP deal, where we take an overpirced but still good pen arm back as a salary dump component?

  14. saltygary

    I wouldn’t normally be one to part with the prospects but I would bundle Mejia with a FMART cherry on top for Lee. Mejia can go either way and still a little too early to tell and FMART can’t stay on the field. Go for it! Lee plus another strong bullpen guy and the Mets will be strong.

    As for Neise, they need to hold on to him. He has been a very serviceable pitcher and is showing there is still a lot of upside.

    I would be very happy with Westbrook and want to stay away from Oswalt. Have always been a big fan of Oswalt but he is on a decline, and has made it clear he is not about NYC. He also has a ton of money still owed. AND him and Uncle Cliff had a big fued and if someone has a problem with Cliff then they have a problem with ME.

    1. CaseStreet

      Mariners don’t need OFers, so no F-Mart.

    2. stickguy

      I leave the (media driven) personality issues out of it. Just look at the talent level.

      I also would love for them to snag Myers. His wife forgave him, so I think it is OK for us to give him a 2nd chance.

      Westbrook for a AA scrub (taking on his salary) would be fine by me too. Hopefully the mets don’t beat him up too bad!

      Guthrie would work also.

      get a solid guy that can pitch respectable games and a lot of innings, letting Taka go help the pen (I honestly don’t think he will survive the summer in the rotation), and it will be a big help.

      Oh, Myers could also slide over to the back end of the pen if needed. He was pretty solid in his term as a closer, and seemed to actually like that type of work.

      screw it, get them both.

  15. stickguy

    oh, and please, spend money like Olney says, and conserve prospects, if possible.

    1. CaseStreet

      So you like Maya and Pedro?

      1. stickguy

        oh yeah, sign Maya if he looked legit.

        consider that to be the money they didn’t spend on the draft of IFAs last year.

        Pedro? No thanks.

  16. stickguy

    well, my #1 target would be haren.

    same as when Teixera was available, I wanted to grab him (and deal with Delgado later), since he was a help right away + the future. And I care about the future!

    next would be Lee, but only if the price comes somewhere into reality.

    Oswalt, only if it is salary releif + no more than 1 kinda prospect. Send them Tejada + stoner maybe. His potential to blow up still scares me.

    stepping down, the 2nd tier guys (for not a lot of prospects back, jsut take on money Fred).

    Myers (I wanted him signed in the off season, especially when he was going cheap)
    Guthrie
    Carmona
    westbrook

    Probably in that order.

  17. tkfj2

    No.

    No Mejia for Lee.
    No Niese for Lee.

    More pitchers on the wrong side of 30. No thanks, and there shouldnt be any other answer.

    1. oleosmirf

      since when is 32 old for a pitcher?

      Lee is a top 10 pitcher in all of baseball and a rotation of Santana, Pelfrey, Lee, Niese and Dickey is the best in baseball hands down and unless the prospect is a cant miss superstar like Strasburg or Lincecum you make the trade without blinking.

      and lets say Lee decides to sign elsewhere, we get 2 top 60 picks in next years draft that will replace Mejia (overhyped) and Tejada (who isnt even in our long term plans) plus the financial flexibility to sign the next best alternative…

    2. CaseStreet

      really, you wouldn’t trade for Halladay, Santana, Oswalt or Carpernter?

      1. oleosmirf

        or Hudson

  18. DNDJohan aka kistics

    I think Reds are going to be in on Lee race too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *