«

»

Jul 02

Ted Berg Expands On What Is Baseball

“The Mets aren’t suffering walk-off losses on the road because they need an eighth-inning guy, they’re suffering walk-off losses on the road because they think they need an eighth-inning guy.”

- Ted Berg – TedQuarters.net

Check out and read the entire article over at Ted Berg’s site where he discusses the quote from Manuel where he said,
All the walk-off losses on the road is indicative of an eighth-inning guy. That’s where an eighth-inning guy pitches. It’s basically that simple. If that eighth-inning guy is the guy, he pitches the tie game on the road. At home, the closer pitches the tie game because you get a chance to bat. That’s just the way that works. I mean, that’s baseball.”

Related posts:

3 comments

  1. njstuckintx

    Having had a chance to read this as I wait for the clock to get closer to “out the door” time, I have to say I agree with Teddy. Jerry will never be confused with being wise regarding the bullpen’s usage.

    1. GravediggerHebner

      I haven’t even read the article but the straw that broke my back on the whole Jerry issue is precisely his repeated statements about the 8th inning and having a “guy” for it.

      Yesterday I finally decided to investigate further so I looked it up and the Mets have allowed fewer runs to their opponent in the 8th inning than any other inning 1-9.

      This breakdown is the inning itself, the # of times the team has played that inning (rain shortened or opposition not coming up in bottom of 9th for example affect that), and the # of runs they’ve allowed in that inning:

      1st – 79 – 37
      2nd – 79 – 24
      3rd – 79 – 56
      4th – 79 – 46
      5th – 79 – 41
      6th – 78 – 22
      7th – 78 – 36
      8th – 78 – 21
      9th – 64 – 22

      So they need a “7th inning guy” or even a “9th inning guy” (let alone a “3rd inning guy”) more than they need an “8th inning guy.” The whole “8th inning guy” thing just sent me over the edge.

      1. njstuckintx

        What killed me was the use of Pedro for the 9th inning against a couple of power hitting righties for the Marlins. For a guy so concerned with splits, you’d think the first thing on his mind would have been “um, Pedro ain’t that good against righties…” But he wanted his quote/unquote man to handle the inning. That frustrated me to no end as I knew they lost that game as soon as it was apparent it was Pedro’s to win/lose.

        How many teams have ever had a Mariano/Wetteland combo? Or even a McDowell/Orosco combo. Very few.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *