At this point the experiment with Bobby Parnell as a starter may be drawing to an end. Unlike Aaron Heilman, Parnell has been given a shot at becoming the starter he wanted to be. Parnell was able to get this chance without sulking like Heilman. Now the Mets have a decision to make, do they still see lots of potential in Parnell like they did in Pelfrey? Allowing Pelfrey to start 0-7 with a 6.10 ERA in 2007. Will the Mets be that patient with Parnell or will he be shifted back into the pen at the end of the season like 2009 never happened? At this point as a starter Parnell is 1-5 with a 7.91 ERA, if you were the Mets what would you do with Parnell? Would you Heilmanize him back to the pen forever and always or would you allow him to take his licks like the Mets did with Pelfrey?